They carry their torch wherever they go and illuminate the way forward.

SaLuSa 18-February-2011


Google+ Followers

Friday, July 29, 2011

Military Disclosure Has Begun – National Press Club LIVE, Washington - The 2012 Scenario

Military Disclosure Has Begun – National Press Club LIVE, Washington

The write-up:

Join us for a truly historic event. At the National Press Club in Washington D.C., an unprecedented gathering of top military and government officials from around the world met LIVE before members of the Press to present to the public alarming facts about UFOs and an extraterrestrial presence now engaging the planet Earth.

This presentation provides LIVE coverage of that historic press conference. In attendance for this shocking, Earth-shattering event includes former Governor of Arizona – Fife Symington; Belgian Airforce Major General, Ret. – Wilfried De Brouwer; Engineer, Astronomer and Astrophysicist – Dr. Claude Poher; Captain, Air France, Ret. – Jean-Charles Duboc; French Astrophysicist – Dr. Jean-Claude Ribes; General, Iranian Airforce, Ret. – Parviz Jafari; Captain, Army of Chile – Rodrigo Bravo Garrido; Commander, Peruvian Airforce, Ret. Oscar Santa Maria Huertas; Founding Member of the Peruvian Airforce Office of Investigation of Anomalous Ariel Phenomena (OIFAA) – Dr. Anthony Choy; Captain, Aurigny Airlines, UK – Ray Bowyer; Officer, British Ministry of Defense, Ret. – Nick Pope; Sgt. United States Airforce, Ret. – James Penniston; Col. United States Airforce, Ret. – Charles Halt; and Division Chief of the Accident Evaluations and Investigations Division of the FAA, Washington D.C., Ret. – John Callahan.

This event was produced by Filmmaker James Fox. His award winning feature film “Out of the Blue” – is coming to DVD in a new special anniversary edition on 8/30/2011 from UFOTV. It’s loaded with bonus features and interviews including this press conference.

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Too Excited for Sleep!

2011 July 28
by Steve Beckow
I’m so exhilarated by what is happening on this site and in the world. How am I going to sleep tonight? If I can’t sleep, I won’t let you sleep. Hey, everybody, wake up!

What’s going on?

In the world, Norway has chosen not to be stampeded by the bombing and shooter attacks. (1) I have to acknowledge that I did not think that such an enlightened response could have been expected from the representatives of any country. It wasn’t something that I would have imagined could happen.

I thought Norway would now join the list of countries who beef up their security, increase their armed forces, and begin watching their citizens’ movements.
But Norway has rejected that approach.  They have taken exactly the opposite course:

“Oslo Mayor Fabian Stang, when asked whether greater security measures were needed, sternly rejected that notion:  ’I don’t think security can solve problems. We need to teach greater respect.’” (2)

I don’t think I can convey how energized I am to see this happen. For me, and I’m only speaking for me, this represents a watershed in human history – the first time I’m aware of that the government of a nation has shown the world what is possible.

I have to add that I’m so busy these days that I haven’t even been able to turn on the TV. I might find that my appraisal of the situation does not actually correspond with what is happening. Maybe I’m deluded. Who cares?  If I’m wrong, do me a favor. Don’t tell me about it. I’d rather remain in this glorious bubble in which I kid myself that I’ve just seem a nation stand out against the false front of “anti-terrorism” and fear-mongering.

If Norway has in fact acted in the way I tell myself it did, the Illuminati is indeed finished. If people on Earth exist who could refuse to be stampeded by the standard black-ops ploys of the Old World Order, then I am going to break out in a dance.  It’s so promising for the rest of us. Let’s emulate Norway’s example.

Reagarding this site, I’ve just had a Skype conversation with someone that has me equally excited. I don’t want to identify who or what we discussed because I don’t want to upstage him. Let it be his announcement when he’s ready. It is a barn-burner of a project and we’ll hear about it soon.

But, fortunately or unfortunately, I’m so inspired by it that I need to rattle on myself or find myself in an upset. Unexpressed joy is an upset. I am in joy. So let me record some thoughts that came out of that call, but without alluding to the project idea that he is currently bringing to maturity.

What our friend is doing has to do with establishing in our minds something that already exists, but which is not “here” in human society because we have barriers to it seeing it. To get at that, I need to say a word about “contexts.”
A context is an idea, a way of speaking that refers to something that is a whole. God is a whole. Love is a whole. Peace is a whole.  Everything can be contained in a whole. A whole embraces all. God embraces all. Other forms, other dimensions, other universes all live within God because “God” is a way of saying “all.” Love contains within it love as well as hate, compassion as well as cold-heartedness. All goes on within love because love is everything. Do you see what I mean?

Within a whole, what is usually observed is that which is not working. It doesn’t have to be that way. The fish can see the water under certain circumstances – like enlightenment. But usually the fish is simply aware of a predator or a rock.

This table I’m rattling away on, which holds up my keyboard, is working. When was the last time I thought about this table? Not since forever.

Actually that isn’t true because at some point during my conversation with my friend, a piece of tape holding something down on the table ceased sticking. It came undone and I became aware of it. Having become aware of it, I fixed it by replacing it with another piece of tape. I took unworkability and restored it to workability. And that is the only time I’ve been aware of this table recently.

What we’re usually aware of in this world is that which does not work – hunger, thirst, poverty, sickness, flooded fields, locust-infested lands, beetle-destroyed forests, and so on.  What then is our work in order to create a world that works for everyone? Simple. Take unworkable conditions and make them work.
And that’s what my friend is about to do, whenever he’s ready to begin. He is taking an unworkable condition within a context and inviting all of us around the world to focus on a point in time  – a deadline – by which that unworkability will be removed and matters restored to workability.

He’s the first person I’ve met recently who’s chosen to do this. (Others have chosen to do it a ways back in time.) But this is what you can do as well. Choose an aspect of the world’s unworkability and create a project designed to elicit global cooperation in making that condition work. Restore things to the way the context would have them be anyways. If people are killing others, focus world attention on it and have it stop.  If people are polluting, focus world attention on it and have it stop. Restore us to the context, the default, the way it is anyways which unworkability obscures. Convert unworkability into workability. That’s all there is to do in life. Workability does not need fixing; only unworkability does.

Always remember that, if you want something to stop, you must set a deadline for it. No sense saying “we shall overcome some day.”  There is no way to coordinate a global project with a deadline like “some day.” In fact you can’t coordinate people using such a non-deadline. You must have a common deadline. Man on the moon by 1970. The end of starvation on the planet by …?

Even the Company of Light has a deadline: We shall ascend by Dec. 21, 2012. And in response, millions of ships arrive with hundreds of millions of people. All working to a common schedule.

There never was a time in human history where there wasn’t more of a chance of having what we set out to do actually happen. This is the time for the shot heard round the world, for the idea whose time has come. Where are the Paul Reveres? Where are the global  minutemen?

The idea of a world that works for everyone is an idea whose time has come. (3) And we are going to make that world of workability happen. Who else if not us? Who else would you rather it be than us?

Choose a condition of the world’s unworkability, make it your project to turn that unworkability into workability, set a date by which it will end, and call for its end by that date.  Coordinate us. Mobilize us. This is the time for that. This is the time for miracles. This is the time for results.

How am I going to sleep tonight? Count sheep? Wait for the sun?


(2) Loc. cit.
(3) I acknowledge Werner Erhard as the source of that phrase and a great deal of this article.

The 2012 Scenario 

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Backgrounder on Illuminati Control of the Mass Media by Steve Beckow

As a way of understanding the possible importance of the Murdoch investigation, let's look at the way the world's media have operated in previous years.

In 1948, when the United States left the war as the world's strongest superpower, it inaugurated the Office of Special Projects. That organization later became the espionage and counter-intelligence branch of the Central Intelligence Agency. Its mission was to concentrate on:

"... propaganda, economic warfare; preventive direct action, including sabotage, anti-sabotage, demolition and evacuation measures; subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance groups, and support of indigenous anti-Communist elements in threatened countries of the free world." (1)

That year saw it initiate Operation Mockingbird, whose purpose was to influence the domestic American media. By the early 1950s, it “owned' respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communications vehicles." (2) It not only tried to sway American media but planted advantageous stories in foreign publications as well.

Within five years, this network of media agents and operatives was overseen by Allen W. Dulles, director of the Central Intelligence Agency. By this time Operation Mockingbird had influence over 25 newspapers and wire agencies. 

These organizations were run by people with well-known right-wing views such as William Paley (CBS), Henry Luce (Time Magazine and Life Magazine), Arthur Hays Sulzberger (New York Times), Alfred Friendly (managing editor of the Washington Post), Jerry O’Leary (Washington Star), Hal Hendrix (Miami News), Barry Bingham Sr., (Louisville Courier-Journal), James Copley (Copley News Services) and Joseph Harrison (Christian Science Monitor). (3)

By 1976, a Congressional report on Operation Mockingbird concluded that:

“The CIA currently maintains a network of several hundred foreign individuals around the world who provide intelligence for the CIA and at times attempt to influence opinion through the use of covert propaganda. These individuals provide the CIA with direct access to a large number of newspapers and periodicals, scores of press services and news agencies, radio and television stations, commercial book publishers, and other foreign media outlets.” (4)

The report's author estimated that the cost of misinforming the world cost American taxpayers nearly $265 million a year.

Later, Carl Bernstein, who worked with Bob Woodward in the investigation of Watergate, provided further information about Operation Mockingbird in an article in The Rolling Stone in October, 1977. Bernstein claimed that over a 25-year period more than 400 American journalists secretly carried out assignments for the CIA:

“Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors-without-portfolio for their country. Most were less exalted: foreign correspondents who found that their association with the Agency helped their work; stringers and freelancers who were as interested in the daring-do of the spy business as in filing articles, and, the smallest category, full-time CIA employees masquerading as journalists abroad.” (5)

Keeping these events in mind, I'd now like to look at the accounts of the sources we follow on this site about the control of the media after this time. In 2005, Matthew Ward told us that the CIA was controlled by the Illuminati and served its aims.  Matthew said:

“A large group within the CIA, which only superficially is an intelligence gathering agency to serve the security of the United States, is composed of Illuminati leaders and operators with diverse nationalities, political persuasions and belief systems, but with one aim: world domination.” (6)

The intelligence agency was involved in the worst mass murder in American domestic history – the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001 – and most other false-flag operations in several countries since then. (7)

CIA funding, which had earlier come from skimming the Marshall Plan, now increasingly came from the world drug trade, Matthew tells us.

“The enormously profitable illegal drug industry funds both [Illuminati] factions’ ‘black ops,’ including terrorist activities blamed on innocents and vast underground areas where their scientists conduct unconscionable experiments on humankind and develop spacecraft, weaponry, surveillance and weather-control systems using technology introduced by the ‘Little greys.’” (8)

Instead of simply planting stories in the media and having many journalists in their pocket, the CIA took an ever wider role in journalism, on behalf of its Illuminati masters. In 2003 the Hathors speaking through Tom Kenyon could advise us that:

“The economic powers that control the global economy [i.e., the Illuminati] are manipulating the press and information systems on your planet to create fear. Fear is an ancient method of manipulating human consciousness.” (9)
In 2009, SaLuSa agreed with the Hathors that the Illuminati controlled the world's media and were using it to keep us in a state of fear.
“The horrors of the world are presented to you on a daily basis, and with the Illuminati controlling and editing your news it is not balanced by reporting the 'good news.' This is a deliberate ploy to keep you in a fearful state, and deny you the opportunity to know that there is much good work taking place.” (10)

The situation had still not changed by last year (2010), SaLuSa informed us:

“We feel bound to keep you informed as to what is happening around you, as it is as well you understand that nothing is [really] like it seems. The media is controlled and you are fed the very news that will support the plan of the dark Ones, and clearly it will be far from the truth. Even with your greater powers with freedom of information, you are still denied much of the truth, as you have found out.” (11)

He agrees with Matthew that the press is owned by the Illuminati and falsifies stories to serve their ends.

“At a time when you have such a good system of communication, it is ironic that it is controlled by those behind the media who determine what you are allowed to know. What should be given a public airing is censored, and results in so many major topics of national interest being hidden away. There has not been such a thing as freedom of the Press to report on all matters of interest for a long time. Indeed reports are falsified to satisfy the aims of the Illuminati, and journalists comply rather than risk losing their jobs. When their lives and family are also threatened it takes a brave person to stand up to them.” (12)

Moreover, the public has grown up on and is conditioned by Illuminati-mandated news, SaLuSa says.

“A large section of the public are engrossed in the negativity that the media regularly feed them. Indeed you have grown up on it, and eventually it has little effect on your emotions. After a time you develop an immunity to being shocked or overawed, even by the atrocities committed almost on a daily basis.” (13)

Of course not all member of the press are Illuminati, Matthew Ward assured his mother in 2003:

“Mother, I don’t mean that all reporters for press, radio and television are aware that much of the information they give out is patently false, or incomplete or distorted facts, and they are given no information that would expose the massive deception and corruption of government operations.

“Many reporters are not aware, others have become suspicious, and some are knowledgeable parts of the disinformation plot. When I say 'media,' it is not with contempt for the reporters who are just doing their job, it refers to the few dark minds who control the information flow.

“Also, I surely do not mean that their strategy fools everyone! We see new lights sparking constantly, indications that hearts and minds are awakening spiritually and mentally and truth is entering feelings and thoughts.” (14)

By 2008, Matthew Ward saw some progress having beejn made in loosening the Illuminati's grip on the media.

“The long era of the controllers is seeing its end as their crimes against humankind and Nature are being exposed in both trickle-up and trickle-down fashion. This is becoming more and more evident even in major media despite the controllers' attempts to stifle emerging truths.” (15)

By 2010, Matthew saw definite gains being made and struck a hopeful note.

“Truth is not yet surging into your mainstream information outlets, but it is seeping ever more strongly now that the finger is out of the dike, so to say. With this media barrier seriously compromised, the dark ones cannot much longer hide the massive deception that in this moment is only barely exposed to the public, much as the tip of an iceberg is visible while the immense part with potentially lethal destructive power lies out of view.” (16)

What was ending was not a 20th-Century phenomenon but a trend that went back millennia, he alleged. The Internet was one powerful tool in defeating the world-domination agenda of the Illuminati. He also credited the rising light energies with causing the fall of media mind-control.

“There have been attempts to stifle the truth since the dawn of communication on Gaia-Terra-Shan-Earth, and the attempts were successful when darkly-inclined ones controlled the dissemination of information. In modern times, they expected to broaden their web of control with the Internet, but instead, it became their undoing.

“Now factual evidence that until recently was mainly restricted to that source is reaching the public through the perseverance of courageous investigative journalists, other reporters, eyewitnesses and individuals disclosing personal experiences.

“Not only is there increasing exposure of lies and corruption, but also innovative ways people are adapting to the economic situation are being publicized. The tearing down of mind control via the media has come about because of the ever-intensifying light.” (17)

One year later, SaLuSa saw a definite change for the better, as the light energies continued to rise on the planet. Here he is in early July 2011:

“We would suggest you pay extra attention to your Press and other news outlets, as within their daily outpourings there is a change of approach taking place, and the real truth is beginning to emerge. You will need to use your discretion as there are still going to be half-truths for quite a time yet.

“What is happening is that the higher vibrations are raising your consciousness levels, and it is strengthening your resolve to get the truth out. Brave souls with something to tell are gaining the wrath of the dark Ones, as they stand tall and are prepared to withstand the consequences.

“We have their karma to consider, but where we can you may be assured they will get our protection. Sometimes they would appear to fail in their attempts to bring matters into the public arena, but often sufficient is done by airing the evidence of malpractice and outright criminal activity.

“Too much has been taking place that the Illuminati seem to have got away with. Yet that has made them careless and feel untouchable, when in fact they are being revealed for what they are with firm evidence of their crimes.

“We need you to keep probing and constantly pushing for the truth to come out, and you will gather support until people power is so strong that it can no longer be ignored.” (18)

SaLuSa may as well have been talking about the Murdochs, his comments are so relevant to their case. It is against the backdrop of these comments that this first largescale assault on an Illuminati bastion of media control is taking place.

I'm biased in hoping, watching and waiting for the fall of the Murdoch journalistic empire. I tend to interpret every expression of public outrage as the beginning of the end of this bastion of Illuminati influence. But in fact the Murdochs could survive this latest scandal and their fall may come only later.

But the fact that the public, the government, and the media have broken ranks and condemned the illegal activity of the Murdochs is at least a hopeful sign and may signal the beginning of the end of Illuminati control over the world's news. Sooner or later, the rising energies will sweep them aside and restore freedom of the press. The more we educate ourselves on the subject, the sooner that will be.

(1) “The CIA's Operation Mockingbird,” The 2012 Scenario, March 28, 2010, at
(2) Loc. cit.
(3) Loc. cit
(4) Loc. cit.
(5) Loc. cit.
(6) Matthew's Message, July 16, 2005, at
(7) “Explosions in Mumbai? Could the Same Group be Responsible as in 2008? (You Bet),” The 2012 Scenario, July 13, 2011, at
(8) Matthew's Message, July 27, 2008.
(9) The Hathors, “Truth and Lies in Global Politics and the Push for Higher Evolution,” Feb. 8, 2003, through Tom Kenyon, at
(11) SaLuSa, Nov. 29, 2010.
(12) SaLuSa, April 14, 2010.
(13) SaLuSa, Jan. 27, 2010.
(14) Matthew's Message, Dec. 31, 2003.
(15) Matthew's Message, July 4, 2008.
(16) Matthew's Message, Sept. 11, 2010.
(17) Loc. cit.
(18) SaLuSa, July 16, 2011.

The 2012 Scenario

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Mancano sei giorni all'estradizione di Julian Assange in Svezia

Six Days Remain before Julian Assange is Extradited to Sweden – click image

Mancano sei giorni all'estradizione di Julian Assange in Svezia

5 Luglio 2011

di Steve Beckow

Fra 6 giorni Julian Assange verrà estradato in Svezia per affrontare quattro incriminazioni per reati sessuali. Tuttavia fino ad oggi non sono state presentate accuse formali contro di lui .Julian è stato tenuto agli arresti domiciliari in Gran Bretagna dal Dicembre 2010, quando la Svezia emise due mandati internazionali di arresto.

Secondo la legge svedese, che non prevede il rilascio su cauzione, all'arrivo in Svezia, Julian verrà incarcerato per un periodo indefinito. Anche se giudicato innocente, sarà tolto dalla circolazione, e questo è probabilmente lo scopo di queste mosse.

E' stato chiesto se la Svezia agisce su comando del governo americano. E' probabile che la prigionia di Julian metta il sistema giudiziario svedese sotto il microscopio e che si dimostri imbarazzante per il governo svedese, i funzionari responsabili delle leggi, dei tribunali e delle carceri svedesi. Per quanto riguarda Julian, gli impedisce di dirigere Wikileaks per un periodo di tempo indefinito. Qui sotto trovate una valutazione delle prospettive di Julian in Svezia, secondo i sostenitori di Julian.

Processo imparziale per Julian Assange?

Critica al sistema giuridico svedese

Tra tutti i firmatari della Convenzione, la Svezia ha il tasso pro capite più alto di casi portati alla Corte Europea per i Diritti Umani, relativi all'articolo 6.1 (diritto ad un processo giusto). Ha anche il tasso più alto di sentenze sfavorevoli, relative a un  processo equo.

Argomentazione della difesa

Nel February Hearing, gli avvocati di Assange hanno sostenuto che il Regno Unito non dovrebbe estradarlo perché in Svezia non affronterebbe processo giusto. Se verrà estradato, Assange non avrà un processo giusto.

Verrà tenuto in prigione, in isolamento, una volta consegnato, nonostante non sia stato accusato. (può anche passare un anno in detenzione). Non c'è limite di tempo alla detenzione in Svezia.
Non c'è possibilità di uscire su cauzione, perciò rimarrebbe in prigione per un tempo indefinito.

Dovessero esserci un'accusa ed un processo, verrebbero tenuti segreti.

Non sarà giudicato da un “tribunale indipendente ed imparziale”, una richiesta fondamentale secondo la Convenzione Europea dei Diritti Umani (articolo 6.1). Tre giudici su quattro sono giudici profani, designati da partiti politici e senza formazione legale formale (vedasi Lay Judges)

L'accusatrice svedese, Marianne Ny, non ha dato a Julian Assange od ai suoi avvocati alcuna informazione scritta sulle incriminazioni contro di lui, e ciò viola il Codice Svedese di Procedura (RB 23:18) e la Convenzione Europea sui Diritti Umani (articolo 5), e la Carta Fondamentale Europea per i Diritti Umani.

C'è stata ingerenza politica nelle dichiarazioni del Primo Ministro al Parlamento svedese durante il processo (si veda Political Interference) ed il legale delle querelanti ha ricevuto attenzione continua da parte della stampa (si veda Media climate in Sweden)

L'accordo bilaterale fra gli Stati Uniti e la Svezia permette che Julian Assange venga estradato negli Stati Uniti non appena arriva in Svezia (si veda la sezione sulla estradizioni degli USA). Sotto la custodia degli USA, Julian Assange rischia il rapimento, la tortura e l'uccisione.

Reazioni in Svezia alla critica del sistema giudiziario svedese
Il Primo Ministro Frederik Reinfeldt disse in un discorso al parlamento che le critiche al sistema giudiziario svedese erano infondate e che gli avvocati di Assange avevano tentato di trattare la Svezia con superiorità (7 Febbraio 2011). Le dichiarazioni originali sono disponibili qui (here)

In un'indagine anonima un giurista su tre era d'accordo sul fatto che la critica di Assange al sistema giudiziario svedese era ben fondata ( (English here, and here). I commenti degli avvocati svedesi rivelano una mancanza profonda di fiducia nel sistema legale.

““ il sistema legale svedese è prossimo a cadere a pezzi per quanto concerne crimini sessuali. Bizzarre teorie sul sesso hanno avuto troppa influenza sui professionisti della giurisprudenza”

“Considerando la pressione mondiale su Assange, è realistico sospettare che qualcosa si stia svolgendo dietro le quinte e che possa influenzare la maniera in cui questo caso viene trattato”

Gli avvocati svedesi Jens Lapidus e Johan Akermark scrissero “la critica di Assange è giusta in molti punti” in uno dei più importanti quotidiani svedesi DN (05 May 2011):
“Condividiamo la critica di Assange sulle regole di detenzione, sui giudici profani Lay Judges e la maniera ordinaria di fare i processi a porte chiuse.

Anche Claes Borgstrom, l'avvocato delle due querelanti nell'indagine Assange ha sostenuto che i periodi di detenzione in Svezia sono troppo lunghi.

Anne Ramberg, il presidente dell'Associazione Avvocati ha affermato:

“Sia il Comitato Europeo per la Prevenzione della Tortura e di altri Trattamenti Inumani e Degradanti ed il Comitato delle Nazioni Unite contro la Tortura  hanno criticato la Svezia per i lunghi periodi di detenzione ed ammettiamo che possono essere incredibilmente lunghi. Abbiamo anche contestato, ripetutamente negli anni, i processi a porte chiuse. Come pure abbiamo contestato i giudici profani, ma a causa del fatto che vengono reclutati entro un gruppo limitato di persone, piuttosto che a causa della politicizzazione dei tribunali.”

Un processo porterebbe alla condanna di Assange?

Le deposizioni delle due querelanti (AA e SW), di Julian Assange e di nove testimoni  sono trapelate in Internet in Gennaio 2011.

Gli avvocati svedesi sono divisi, non tutti ritengono che Assange verrà condannato per le accuse contro di lui.

Discutendo se Assange verrà riconosciuto innocente, se accusato:

Il professore di giustizia penale Per Ole Traskman (Università di Lund Svezia) ed il ricercatore dottorato Sakari Melander (Università di Helsinki) hanno discusso sulle accuse di stupro contro Assange nel quotidiano finlandese Helsingin Sanomat. Hanno sostenuto che una condanna era improbabile:

       Traskman: Basandosi sulle prove disponibili, è improbabile che Assange sarà condannato per i reati sospettati. Inoltre, l'accusatore non ha ancora presentato le accuse. Ciò significa che l'accusatore pensa che non ci siano ragioni sufficienti per impostare un' accusa a questo punto. Ecco perché ella vuole che Assange venga sentito in Svezia, sulla base di un mandato d'arresto europeo.

       Melander:  “il successo di una possibile accusa in tribunale non è probabile perché ci sono dei ragionevoli dubbi sulla colpevolezza di Assange. Se la colpevolezza non è chiara, oppure con c'è totale certezza,  il caso deve essere risolto a favore dell'accusato.”
La trascrizione completa in inglese è disponibile qui (available here)
Bjorn Hurtig, consigliere difensivo di Assange in Svezia, ha stimato che ci sarebbe una probabilità al 50% di condanna. Tuttavia discusse quanto segue in una lettera al consigliere difensivo inglese di Assange, Mark Stephens:
“Dopo aver studiato il fascicolo come pure altro materiale che mi è stato permesso consultare, ma non fotocopiare od annotare, (messaggi sms dei cellulari delle querelanti) il caso è uno dei più deboli che abbia mai visto nella mia carriera professionale....”
“E' altamente incerto se il Sig Assange verrà perseguito, se estradato. Se perseguito, considero altamente improbabile che venga condannato. Se condannato sarà molto probabile che, considerando la natura ed i dettagli delle accuse stesse (la mancanza di minacce e di violenza fisica, le relazioni sessuali consensuali tra le querelanti ed il Sig. Assange prima dell'avvenimento e, nel caso di (AA) (la sua prova su questo punto è contraddittoria) dopo gli incidenti e le circostanze personali, abbia la condanna sospesa.”

Discutendo se Assange verrà riconosciuto colpevole, se accusato:
Per E. Samuelson, un avvocato penalista svedese di primo piano, specializzato nei casi di stupro, ha spiegato il contesto delle accuse di stupro contro Assange e la dura battaglia che deve affrontare per dimostrare la sua innocenza. Samuelsson è stato anche citato in un articolo dell'AOL 

  “La gente di altri paesi con culture legali differenti non riesce a capire quanto ampio e vasto sia il sistema legale svedese in riguardo a crimini sessuali. Le accuse fatte a Julian Assange in Svezia devono sembrargli delle assurdità, quasi uno scherzo. Ma deve capire che per queste cose gli uomini in Svezia vanno in prigione.”
“C'è stata una discussione (della legge relativa a reati sessuali nel 2007) ma non è stata cambiata. La pressione politica che ha come punto d'inizio l'uguaglianza delle donne nella società – che è encomiabile, come principio – ha portato ad una grandissima ed inaccettabile insicurezza degli imputati in Svezia.
E' quello che sta vivendo Assange proprio ora. Il movimento femminista in Svezia è particolarmente forte. Le attiviste dei diritti femminili hanno a lungo accusato i giudici di credere di più agli uomini. E' stato detto che era impossibile per una donna ottenere giustizia. Ora in Svezia è vero il contrario.
“Oggi si richiedono condanne in base ad un tenore politico (un tasso più alto di condanne ero lo scopo dichiarato di Thomas Bodstrom (il socio dello studio legale che rappresenta le due querelanti di Assange) mentre era Ministro della Giustizia e promuoveva le riforme alla legge contro i reati sessuali.)
Il tenore: in casi di stupro, gli uomini devono essere condannati; altrimenti non è giusto per le donne. Questo è indegno di uno stato costituzionale.”

“In Svezia l'opinione generale è: tu stai dicendo la verità perché sei una donna. Questo è il colmo, secondo me. Io sono per l'uguaglianza delle donne, nella società. Naturalmente. Ma non ci si deve spingere in là così tanto da condannare degli innocenti. In Svezia, la cosiddetta prospettiva della vittima è così sviluppata che ci sono persino delle persone che credono in tutta serietà che sia inaccettabile che le donne in generale vengano esposte ai rigori di un interrogatorio in tribunale. La gente dice che noi, quali avvocati che discutono il caso, offenderemmo queste donne perché le interroghiamo per conto dei nostri clienti. Penso che una tale cultura sia senza precedenti nell'Europa Occidentale.”

Articoli correlati:
Further Resources:
Evidence by Björn Hurtig regarding the nature of the allegations

Traduzione: Laura

Monday, July 11, 2011

THANK YOU Tangerine Bolen & Michael Moore

Mike & Friends Blog

Tangerine Bolen

Tangerine Bolen, MPH-HMP is founder and director of RevolutionTruth, a global community and organization dedicated to defending WikiLeaks, whistleblowers, and legitimate democracies. 

July 9th, 2011 8:39 PM

WikiLeaks is the New Red Scare

I founded and lead RevolutionTruth, a growing, global community and organization dedicated to defending WikiLeaks, whistleblowers, and legitimate democracies. RevolutionTruth defends WikiLeaks (WL) - not because WikiLeaks is perfect or uncomplicated. The WikiLeaks phenomenon is indeed, very complex. We defend them for two primary reasons: First, the way the U.S. government has responded to WikiLeaks and Julian Assange is both alarming and dangerous. The federal government has signaled a willingness to change U.S. laws on espionage, in order to ensnare Julian Assange.

What does this mean? It is the threat of a severe curtailing of the "free" press. A press that is already highly compromised, in its corporatized, sanitized state. If the U.S. government has its way, journalists could be forced to reveal their sources, and anonymous leaks of classified information  (i.e. instances of whistleblowing) could be considered "espionage." The U.S. government's actions and behavior around WikiLeaks is an irresponsible assault on our democratic freedoms. Freedoms that have already been profoundly weakened since the year 2000.

Under the Bush administration, the U.S. government began to engage in unprecedented spying on U.S. citizens - both legally and extra-legally. Innocent people are being wire-tapped without cause. Journalist's emails are monitored in an attempt to discover sources of classified information. Innocent citizens, regular people who are exercising their democratic rights of free speech or protest, are monitored. Why? Because the law now allows for this. The Patriot Act has encouraged an unprecedented over-reach into our lives as private citizens. In lockstep with the Patriot Act's over-reach, the Department of Homeland Security has classified hundreds of different types of citizen groups, including environmentalists, as "threats". A cursory examination of the policies and behaviors of the federal government over the last ten years illuminates an odd and chilling trend: the U.S. government is treating its own citizens as enemies.

This is madness. It is democracy's death by a thousand cuts, and this death is one that largely goes unnoticed while a nation sleeps.

When considering WikiLeaks, one must ponder several fundamental questions. Foremost is this: Is it ok for any one organization to have the power to expose state secrets, at random? The answer to this is: "No, but..." No, on the surface, it is not ok that a stateless organization have the power to release critical state secrets at will. Every democracy has need of some measure of secrecy. In a world of political realism, with countries that behave far, far worse than the U.S., this is a simple fact.

But a democracy (or a democratic republic) has to balance secrecy and transparency. A democracy is the will of the people, it IS the people; in the U.S., it is the people, allegedly governing themselves, through representation. A democracy EARNS its secrecy, by abiding by and upholding laws that serve true democratic governance. A democracy earns its secrecy by serving the best interests of its citizens. In order to survive, democracy must have functioning checks and balances against abuses of power - across all systems of government. Those checks and balances must be especially robust when it comes to our national security agencies - or we find ourselves in the unenviable position of trading our civil liberties for an illusion of safety.

We have moved so far away from healthy and functioning democratic governance in the last ten years, that it is mind-bending. We stand poised on a metaphorical cliff in the U.S.: Fundamental rights and freedoms remain basically intact at present, but they are either being chipped away, or outright assaulted. As a people, we are too tired, too busy, too entertained, too distracted, to pay attention to what is dying in our midst.

Is it ok for any one organization to expose state secrets, at will? No, but....WikiLeaks functions as a profound course correction - a clarion call in profoundly dark times. WikiLeaks' revelations momentarily give us, the people, the keys to the kingdom.  And these revelations prove, without a doubt, a systemic lack of accountability, abuses of power, lack of integrity, and unethical behavior, much of it in the name of a twisted sense of "national security". Since 9/11, our national security body is so dysfunctional, it too often produces the antithesis of what it is allegedly working toward. National security is not this rampant destruction of rights, nor is it starting wars based on lies. In the midst of this madness, WikiLeaks' revelations paint a clear picture of a nation that has abandoned its democratic moorings.

Does WikiLeaks itself need a course correction? Perhaps. EVERY organization needs checks and balances, EVERY organization needs to be accountable. And an organization that wields such power as WikiLeaks absolutely has to adopt impeccable and relentless journalistic standards. Even beyond this, WikiLeaks needs to be examined for the game-changing phenomenon it is - and rational, sensible, people of the world - people who do not have a stake in denying freedoms, but who understand the dangers of political realism, need to think on best uses of, and evolution of WikiLeaks. And the outcome of these deliberations needs to be taken seriously by this organization.

But we, the people, have much to think on, and much to do. We stand at a critical juncture - not just in our own nation's history, but in the history of humanity. WikiLeaks has redefined the nature of that juncture. This organization has momentarily made it possible for common people to regain power through access to truths we need. These truths help us to put our governments back in place; subsequently, WikiLeaks helps us ensure legitimate democracies.

Yet the U.S. government's assaults on freedom are so effective that many people are afraid to express support for WikiLeaks. When loss of freedoms occurs by slow creep, or at a time of collective struggle, such as ours, people are inured against any visceral sense of this loss. Under the mantle of byzantine laws and trillion dollar bureaucracies, and under the menace of a government that is both openly and subtly threatening punishment for supporting WikiLeaks, self-censorship becomes reflexive. It becomes normal to be quiet, to not make waves. WikiLeaks is the new "red scare".

Each week I encounter at least one instance of hushed tones and hesitation, fear, reluctance and comments such as "I have a business to run" or, "I have a mortgage to pay". These are legitimate daily concerns, however, what do these things have to do with WikiLeaks? Is the message we are getting from this rabid attack on everything WikiLeaks, that if we support them openly, we could lose everything? This message, unfathomable as it seems, has permeated the consciousness of too many Americans. And this fact alone should be enough to fuel the fight for our rights - this fact should send alarm bells clanging inside each of us. We are on a very slippery slope in the U.S., backed by ten years of undeniable evidence of a federal assault on democracy, and we falling.

RevolutionTruth supports WikiLeaks, because, if we allow ourselves to fall into the trap of building our own mental prisons, if we fail to stand up and together, and choose the course of our nations, we fail ALL of our futures. We fail to take this breath of freedom, this moment of possibility, and we slink back to allow a profoundly wayward government (and other, even more insidious powers) to define our world. If we fail to stand up, now, we sell ourselves, and our children, into modern-day, corporate, national security state slavery. At this particular juncture in history, where you may be afraid of the U.S government's response to WikiLeaks, silence is our enemy.

The choice is yours. Will you wait on the sidelines as the U.S. government sinks deeper into its own lies and pathology? Which side do you stand on? The truth - painful, ugly, dangerous as it may seem, or the way the truth is being taken from you, ever more lawfully?

It is up to us to shape our futures. The members of RevolutionTruth know where we stand. And it is on the right side of history.
Creative Commons License This content is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

Saturday, July 9, 2011

Public Response to World Disclosure Day -- The 2012 Scenario

Public Response to World Disclosure Day

2011 July 8
by Steve Beckow

OK, I took posts from 7 out of 16 Google pages, enough to demonstrate that Steve Bassett’s World Disclosure Day has struck a chord out there. I could go on but I think the point is made. Thanks to everyone who spread the word! We will find our way home!




World Disclosure Day July 8, 2011


Saturday, 2 July 2011

The Era of “UFO: is over. It ended no later that 1991. “UFO” is now an anachronistic contradiction in terms.

Disclosure – the formal acknowledgement of an extraterrestrial presence by world governments – is the primary goal of a growing worldwide truth movement. The purpose of World Disclosure Day is to provide a focal point for people and organizations to come together to assert their right to know and demand cosmic truths being withheld from them by their governments. World Disclosure Day will also help broaden public awareness of the Disclosure process and those organizations advocating for the truth on behalf of all citizens. In time various relevant events will come to be scheduled on this day.

Petition open for Worldwide support.

From Nancy on the 2012 Scenario Discussion Group:

I was Blessed for calling the White House on World Disclosure Day !!

I wanted to share with you all, that after listening to the President’s speech today, I called the White House. I spoke to a woman about  World Disclosure Day going on. How the GF will be making the announcement very soon if the President doesn’t. That the people are ready and will do it themselves. That he and his family have Divine protection and he is well aware of all of this.
She was very interested in it herself. So I gave her the website to research it herself.

After I got off the phone, I smelled a strong sent of sandlewood and rose! I did not see anything, but I knew that was a positive sign.

I am hoping as others see this message, they will do the same thing. We need to let our ‘leaders’ know that it is ‘time’.


—  “Susan”  wrote:
> What a great thing to do, Nancy.
> Can you all imagine if say one million people called the White House and said this.
> mmmm.
> Blessings,
> Susan

Re: I was Blessed for calling the White House on World Disclosure Day !!
Yes, I feel wonderful after making that call! It definitely was viewed by someone off world as a very good thing! I think the more people that contact our ‘leaders’, may give them the nudge them may need. Whether they act or not is up to them. But they will know they are supposed to Disclose. Nancy

Bad UFOs: Skepticism, UFOs, and The Universe

Reflections on UFOs, skepticism, and practically anything else by Robert Sheaffer, author of “UFO Sightings,” and the Psychic Vibrations column in The Skeptical Inquirer.
Friday, July 8, 2011

Happy World UFO Disclosure Day!


As you may have heard, UFO activists have declared today, July 8, as the first-ever “World Disclosure Day”. This date was chosen because it’s the anniversary of what they see as the beginning of the  supposed Roswell crash cover-up. According to AOL Weird News, Stephen Bassett is “a registered lobbyist who runs the Extraterrestrial Phenomena Political Action Committee, an organization that since the late 1990s has been demanding Congress release information about the presence of aliens as soon as possible.” He says “There was an arms race, a space race, and now we have a disclosure race. There are a dozen or so countries that might well effect disclosure tomorrow. It is hoped the Obama administration will become aware of this and take action.” However, the Big Oil companies are pressuring the government to keep secret the free energy that alien technology offers us. So here we are, sixty-four years later, and the U.S. government still has not “disclosed” the presence of aliens all around us.

In honor of Disclosure Day, let me quote a few of the optimistic “disclosure” predictions of the past:
  • ” It is my analysis that the ending of the official government’s UFO cover-up began August 7, 1996… we may expect further announcements related to UFOs and extraterrestrial life, after the November 5 election.” UFOlogist Dr. Richard Boylan,
  • “Before the year is out, the Government perhaps the President—is expected to make what are described as ‘unsettling disclosures’ about UFOs” – U.S. News & World Report, April 18, 1977.
  • “Aliens… will begin trans­mitting their secrets to us no later than August, 1977” – Jeane Dixon, 1976.
  • “We predict that by 1975 the government will release definite proof that extraterrestrials are watching us.” – Ralph and Judy Blum, in Beyond Earth: Man’s Contact with UFOs (1974).
  • “The time is getting near when the U.S. Air Force will have to end its longstanding tactic of concealment.” – Syndicated columnist Roscoe Drum­mond, 1974.
  • “FLYING SAUCERS—THE REAL STORY: U.S. BUILT FIRST ONE IN 1942. Jet-propelled disks can outfly other planes … By choosing which [jet] noz­zles to turn on or off and the angle of tilt, the pilot could make the saucer rise or descend vertically, hover, or fly straight ahead, or make sharp turns… a big advance in the science of flying… No official announcements are being made yet, but about the only big secret left is “who makes them.” Evidence points to Navy experiments… ” – News “scoop” in U.S. News & World Report, April 7, 1950.
Happy World Disclosure Day! (But don’t hold your breath waiting for it.)

Posted by Robert Sheaffer at 9:46 AM


Exopolitics – UFO is of the Past – Disclosure is the Future – Truth Campaign Creates New Reality


Jul.01, 2011
From: Paradigm Research Group 

Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:44 PM
PRG Press Release – World Disclosure Day
Press Release – July 1, 2011

Friday, 08 July, 2011

Disclosure Day

Attention please. Today is World Disclosure Day.

Disclosure – the formal acknowledgement of an extraterrestrial presence by world governments – is the primary goal of a growing worldwide truth movement.  The purpose of World Disclosure Day is to provide a focal point for people and organizations to come together to assert their right to know and demand cosmic truths being withheld from them by their governments.

As you were.

Please help Endorse “WORLD DISCLOSURE DAY” July 8th 2011

Happy UFO ‘World Disclosure Day’

Now, a group of UFO truthers is hoping to turn this date into one of revelation, not repression, by declaring July 8 as the first ever “World Disclosure Day.”

It’s an annual 24-hour period when pro-disclosure advocates like Stephen Bassett hope people will focus attention on an alleged truth embargo that he says has resulted in the withholding of knowledge by all major world governments about a supposed extraterrestrial presence here on Earth.

In addition, supporters are encouraged to discuss how things might change once an official announcement has been made and what policies should — or have been — enacted by world leaders post-disclosure.

Endorse World Disclosure Day

EarthSpir –

Here people and organizations from every nation are invited to record their support for a World Disclosure Day as a new component of the truth advocacy process.

Thread: Steve Bassett’s PRG’s New Project -World Disclosure Day July 8th.

“World Disclosure Day ™

July 8

World Disclosure Day is a project of Paradigm Research Group – Contact PRG

You can discuss this project at
the WDD Facebook page:

Here people and organizations from every nation are invited to record their support for a World Disclosure Day. 
World Disclosure Day is a project of Paradigm Research Group. The concept was originally put forward by Steve Beckow in August of 2010.

Note: On the day the first nation comes forward to finally and formally acknowledge the extraterrestrial presence, that date will then become World Disclosure Day historically recognizing the most profound event in human history.

Interesting, timing is everything, and SB is not silly,
i’m guessing they have picked this date well…..


Dont believe a word “they” tell you

World Disclosure Day July 8th Help Support! Make Viral!

Uploaded by AustralianPhenomena on 3 Jul 2011


phideaux is online now Possesses Wisdom and Durability Shipping Metal

Default It’s World Disclosure Day – July 8!

Silver Solidarity Ribbon for World Disclosure Day~JULY 8TH 2011

FatherMotherGod Amon Ra's picture
By FatherMotherGod…

Karen Patrick suggests we wear a silver ribbon on World Disclosure Day, reminiscent of the silver weather balloon hoax surrounding the Roswell Crash in 1947.

World Disclosure Day

PicBadge for people worldwide who want to endorse the project World Disclosure Day.

Location: United States

News (the kind we want to mail)

Fun Factory

Posted by Missie Jun 30th
Category: Most interesting News

World Disclosure Day – July 8

Thanks, Divine! – Steve
Join Date: Jul 2011
Feedback: 0/0/0
World Disclosure Day

See also:


Wether you’ve been aware of it or not there is a Growing movement all round the world to push for all the world governments to DISCLOSE all its infomation regarding The Extraterrestrial presence.

We’ve all been brought up to belive that we are all alone in the vast universe…nothing could be further from the truth..theres more love for us than we could possibly belive.

What isnt being told is that there is many different civilisations here at this time to help mankind realise our true nature as divine humans and to help us move into a new era of peace and co-operation..we’ve been led to belive that any other race in the universe are ‘aliens’ ‘predators’ bloodthirsty monsters etc…but the reality is that they are SPIRITUALLY evolved and live by universal love for all beings.

But this is for you to make up your own minds about…If your interested and want to know more about disclosure/our star family etc check out these sties love to you all.
Lots of infomation on this site

Re: World Disclosure Day™- July 8

« Reply #1 on Jul 6, 2011, 11:10pm »

Has Bassett put out his smoking gun 10000s of pages of documents he claims he gave to obama and was blocked and if obama didnt get anywhere within 100 days he would realise them slowly and that they allowed validation and verification this was 12 months ago and still we wait so the challange to basset is where is the smoking gun 

World Disclosure Day is good idea but lets give it a big old kick in the pants as far as some meat on the bones to give us something to work with

« Last Edit: Jul 6, 2011, 11:10pm by magooollo » Link to Post – Back to Top IP: Logged

Joined: Feb 2011

8th July World Disclosure Day

Original press release:
Washington, DC – Paradigm Research Group has today initiated an international effort to designate July 8 as World Disclosure Day.

UFO Updates

A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena

‘Its All Here In Black & White’

PRG Update – June 30, 2011 

From: Stephen Bassett <PRG.nul>

Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:40:37 -0700
Archived: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 07:54:51 -0400
Subject: PRG Update - June 30, 2011

Paradigm Research Group
PRG Update - June 30, 2011


The 2012 Scenario

The Declaration of Human Freedom

The Declaration of Human Freedom

Every being is a divine and eternal soul living in a temporal body. Every being was alive before birth and will live after death.

Every soul enters into physical life for the purpose of experience and education, that it may, in the course of many lifetimes, learn its true identity as a fragment of the Divine.

Life itself is a constant process of spiritual evolution and unfoldment, based on free choice, that continues until such time as we realize our true nature and return to the Divine from which we came.

No soul enters life to serve another, except by choice, but to serve its own purpose and that of the Divine from which it came.

All life is governed by natural and universal laws which precede and outweigh the laws of humanity. These laws, such as the law of karma, the law of attraction, and the law of free will, are decreed by God to order existence and assist each person to achieve life’s purpose.

No government can or should survive that derives its existence from the enforced submission of its people or that denies its people their basic rights and freedoms.

Life is a movement from one existence to another, in varied venues throughout the universe and in other universes and dimensions of existence. We are not alone in the universe but share it with other civilizations, most of them peace-loving, many of whom are more advanced than we are, some of whom can be seen with our eyes and some of whom cannot.

The evidence of our five senses is not the final arbiter of existence. Humans are spiritual as well as physical entities and the spiritual side of life transcends the physical. God is a Spirit and the final touchstone of God’s Truth is not physical but spiritual. The Truth is to be found inward.

God is one and, because of this, souls are one. They form a unity. They are meant to live in peace and harmony together in a “common unity” or community. The use of force to settle affairs runs contrary to natural law. Every person should have the right to conduct his or her own affairs without force, as long as his or her choices do not harm another.

No person shall be forced into marriage against his or her will. No woman shall be forced to bear or not bear children, against her will. No person shall be forced to hold or not hold views or worship in a manner contrary to his or her choice. Nothing vital to existence shall be withheld from another if it is within the community’s power to give.

Every person shall retain the ability to think, speak, and act as they choose, as long as they not harm another. Every person has the right to choose, study and practice the education and career of their choice without interference, provided they not harm another.

No one has the right to kill another. No one has the right to steal from another. No one has the right to force himself or herself upon another in any way.

Any government that harms its citizens, deprives them of their property or rights without their consent, or makes offensive war upon its neighbors, no matter how it misrepresents the situation, has lost its legitimacy. No government may govern without the consent of its people. All governments are tasked with seeing to the wellbeing of their citizens. Any government which forces its citizens to see to its own wellbeing without attending to theirs has lost its legitimacy.

Men and women are meant to live fulfilling lives, free of want, wherever they wish and under the conditions they desire, providing their choices do not harm another and are humanly attainable.

Children are meant to live lives under the beneficent protection of all, free of exploitation, with unhindered access to the necessities of life, education, and health care.

All forms of exploitation, oppression, and persecution run counter to universal and natural law. All disagreements are meant to be resolved amicably.

Any human law that runs counter to natural and universal law is invalid and should not survive. The enactment or enforcement of human law that runs counter to natural and universal law brings consequences that cannot be escaped, in this life or another. While one may escape temporal justice, one does not escape divine justice.

All outcomes are to the greater glory of God and to God do we look for the fulfillment of our needs and for love, peace, and wisdom. So let it be. Aum/Amen.

Help us fight the extrajudicial US banking embargo: have you contributed to WikiLeaks this month?

Don’t Abandon Julian Assange Now

Messages of Love and Light

Messages of Love and Light

Galactic Family and Keshe

Click the button CC to choose your language subtitles


The 2012 Scenario

FEBRUARY 7, 2013 - 7:00PM EST

FEBRUARY 7, 2013 - 7:00PM EST

Profile for Fran Zepeda

オバマが国際刑事裁判所に再加入・・・米国はもはやならず者国家ではない 2012年5月3日

オバマが国際刑事裁判所に再加入・・・米国はもはやならず者国家ではない 2012年5月3日

Qu’est ce qu’être humain? par Steve Beckow