They carry their torch wherever they go and illuminate the way forward.

SaLuSa 18-February-2011


Google+ Followers

Friday, May 6, 2011

May 6 - My Theory of a Sting Has Proven Improbable

My Theory of a Sting Has Proven Improbable

2011 May 6
by Steve Beckow

I’ve been entertaining the hypothesis that the President is running a sting operation to entrap the 9/11 conspirators.

My thinking was that the President created an operation that would fail in so many circumstances that Congress and the public would demand a second commission of inquiry which would gradually broaden in scope until it took in the whole of the 9/11 false-flag operation.

I was initially convinced that this would prove to be the start of intensive accountability operations that would see the cabal finally broken and brought to justice and would usher in disclosure.

But after doing as much research as one can do when an event is fresh out of the starting gate, I’ve come to doubt the likelihood of that scenario.  While not being convinced that the man killed in Abbottabad is Osama bin Laden and not having changed any of my views on the role (or lack of role) of Osama in the execution of 9/11, I nevertheless have come to doubt that the President is engineering a sting operation and have decided not to pursue my original conjecture.

Having reviewed articles and video related to the Abbottabad raid, I now think that President Obama genuinely believes that American troops killed Osama bin Laden on May 2. (1)

I’ve examined accounts of the intelligence gathered before the raid, the decision-making process, the preparations for the raid, the raid itself, the Obama team and CIA Director Panetta witnessing the raid, the manner in which errors in describing the raid occurred, and the DNA testing process. The cumulative evidence points to the conclusion that the President and CIA Director Leon Panetta are genuine in their beliefs as expressed in most news stories.

Occam’s Razor figured largely here as well. To account for all the variables that would be needed to establish my theory of a sting was much more complicated than the theory that presents itself from a review of the facts.

A piece of evidence that weighed heavily with me was PBS’s interview with CIA Director Leon Panetta.  I’ve watched this video a number of times. There is nothing in Panetta’s words or demeanor that suggests that he is being insincere in the view he puts forward.

Watch the full episode. See more PBS NewsHour.

DNA Evidence

One of my objections to the scenario presented by the Administration was that I didn’t think that DNA identification could be made that quickly. But an article by suggests that much of the DNA matching had been done prior to the attack using samples from Osama’s relatives and the rest was done using a speedy process only recently made available. Time says:

That’s where his brothers and sisters come in. Bits of a person’s unique genetic fingerprint are shared with his or her siblings and parents — since the latter are the ones who give you your DNA to begin with — so DNA swabs collected from the raid in Pakistan would have been matched with reference samples from bin Laden’s siblings. A close match identifies bin Laden with an exceedingly high probability of accuracy.

Indeed, taken together, the proof was strong enough to prompt President Obama to deliver a dramatic address to the nation on Sunday night declaring that the U.S. had successfully killed the terrorist mastermind.

The identification was also confirmed with terrific speed. As Kit Eaton at Fast Company reported:

Typical lab-based DNA matching tests like this can take up to 14 days; they’re painstaking and need to be repeated several times to ensure the sample’s not contaminated from any other DNA sources. But that’s not necessarily the only way to do these tests: late in 2010, a University of Arizona team presented research on a machine that can do the analysis in just two hours in a largely automated way.

It’s possible that knowing they were engaged on a mission to capture bin Laden, U.S. forces arranged for access to a machine like this to be on quick alert — probably for flying blood, cheek cells, and other samples taken from the body to the lab for expedited analysis.

Eaton also pointed out that DNA matching isn’t an exact science and that sibling matching is even less exact: “It all comes down to a probability, with a statement like, ‘There’s a 1 in 1 quadrillion chance this isn’t the same person in both DNA samples.’ In other words: conspiracy theorists still have something to talk about.” (3)

I find this evidence to be probable and persuasive.

Not Convinced It Was Osama

I personally still do not believe that Osama bin Laden was in the compound because I accept the view, most strongly put forward by  Benazir Bhutto in a 2007 interview, that Osama was killed in late 2001/early 2002. I don’t think Osama could have survived ten years when he was already in renal failure and on kidney dialysis in 2001. I don’t accept that Osama was the mastermind of 9/11 either.

Matthew Ward has stated that Osama was not killed on May 2, 2011. Suzy Ward relayed this message from Matthew:

“Matthew said he’ll speak about this in his next message, but to answer your question now: No, the US did not kill Osama bin Laden May 2 in Pakistan — or any day, anywhere!” (2)

I hope we’ll hear details from Matthew about who it may have been, what actually happened with the body, etc.

In this video, Alex Jones asserts that the whole scenario is a “wag the dog” charade. That theory, I think, goes too far in the opposite direction and I don’t believe it either.

After examining all the evidence and after reflection, I’ve concluded that my own scenario is improbable and not supported.

I regret having introduced readers to a theory that has in the end not proven fruitful.


(1) May 2 in Pakistan; May 1 in the U.S.A.
(2) Suzy Ward to Steve Beckow, May 4, 2011.
(3) Meredith Melnick, “It’s a Match: How Officials Used DNA to Identify bin Laden,”  Healthland, May 2, 2011,  at

Other Readings,8599,2069249,00.html


No comments:

Post a Comment

The Declaration of Human Freedom

The Declaration of Human Freedom

Every being is a divine and eternal soul living in a temporal body. Every being was alive before birth and will live after death.

Every soul enters into physical life for the purpose of experience and education, that it may, in the course of many lifetimes, learn its true identity as a fragment of the Divine.

Life itself is a constant process of spiritual evolution and unfoldment, based on free choice, that continues until such time as we realize our true nature and return to the Divine from which we came.

No soul enters life to serve another, except by choice, but to serve its own purpose and that of the Divine from which it came.

All life is governed by natural and universal laws which precede and outweigh the laws of humanity. These laws, such as the law of karma, the law of attraction, and the law of free will, are decreed by God to order existence and assist each person to achieve life’s purpose.

No government can or should survive that derives its existence from the enforced submission of its people or that denies its people their basic rights and freedoms.

Life is a movement from one existence to another, in varied venues throughout the universe and in other universes and dimensions of existence. We are not alone in the universe but share it with other civilizations, most of them peace-loving, many of whom are more advanced than we are, some of whom can be seen with our eyes and some of whom cannot.

The evidence of our five senses is not the final arbiter of existence. Humans are spiritual as well as physical entities and the spiritual side of life transcends the physical. God is a Spirit and the final touchstone of God’s Truth is not physical but spiritual. The Truth is to be found inward.

God is one and, because of this, souls are one. They form a unity. They are meant to live in peace and harmony together in a “common unity” or community. The use of force to settle affairs runs contrary to natural law. Every person should have the right to conduct his or her own affairs without force, as long as his or her choices do not harm another.

No person shall be forced into marriage against his or her will. No woman shall be forced to bear or not bear children, against her will. No person shall be forced to hold or not hold views or worship in a manner contrary to his or her choice. Nothing vital to existence shall be withheld from another if it is within the community’s power to give.

Every person shall retain the ability to think, speak, and act as they choose, as long as they not harm another. Every person has the right to choose, study and practice the education and career of their choice without interference, provided they not harm another.

No one has the right to kill another. No one has the right to steal from another. No one has the right to force himself or herself upon another in any way.

Any government that harms its citizens, deprives them of their property or rights without their consent, or makes offensive war upon its neighbors, no matter how it misrepresents the situation, has lost its legitimacy. No government may govern without the consent of its people. All governments are tasked with seeing to the wellbeing of their citizens. Any government which forces its citizens to see to its own wellbeing without attending to theirs has lost its legitimacy.

Men and women are meant to live fulfilling lives, free of want, wherever they wish and under the conditions they desire, providing their choices do not harm another and are humanly attainable.

Children are meant to live lives under the beneficent protection of all, free of exploitation, with unhindered access to the necessities of life, education, and health care.

All forms of exploitation, oppression, and persecution run counter to universal and natural law. All disagreements are meant to be resolved amicably.

Any human law that runs counter to natural and universal law is invalid and should not survive. The enactment or enforcement of human law that runs counter to natural and universal law brings consequences that cannot be escaped, in this life or another. While one may escape temporal justice, one does not escape divine justice.

All outcomes are to the greater glory of God and to God do we look for the fulfillment of our needs and for love, peace, and wisdom. So let it be. Aum/Amen.

Help us fight the extrajudicial US banking embargo: have you contributed to WikiLeaks this month?

Don’t Abandon Julian Assange Now

Messages of Love and Light

Messages of Love and Light

Galactic Family and Keshe

Click the button CC to choose your language subtitles


The 2012 Scenario

FEBRUARY 7, 2013 - 7:00PM EST

FEBRUARY 7, 2013 - 7:00PM EST

Profile for Fran Zepeda

オバマが国際刑事裁判所に再加入・・・米国はもはやならず者国家ではない 2012年5月3日

オバマが国際刑事裁判所に再加入・・・米国はもはやならず者国家ではない 2012年5月3日

Qu’est ce qu’être humain? par Steve Beckow